Attorney's Fees on Collection Accounts

    Creditors rightfully expect their debtors to pay the attorney's fees that result from collection procedures.  Courts, however, normally refuse an award of attorney's fees unless the debtor has executed a document awarding such costs in the event the account is turned over to an attorney for collection.  Many creditors utilize a standard form contract, or note, which has such a provision.  Because many forms are multi-state, and because states' laws vary, most standard forms provide for "reasonable attorney's fees."  Traditionally, most courts in Central Virginia have interpreted "reasonable" to be the equivalent of 25% of the principle amount of the judgment, regardless of the actual legal fees charged, whether hourly or contingency.  However, these days may be coming to an end due to court rulings!
    The Virginia Supreme Court, in the case of Coady v. Strategic Resources, Inc., ruled that an award of attorney’s fees rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.  In the case of J. R. Mullins, et al. v. Richlands National Bank, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that the trial court must determine the reasonableness of attorney's fees when disputed.  In the case of Chawla v. BurgerBusters, Inc., the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that a party requesting an award of attorney’s fees must establish a prima facie case that the fees requested are reasonable.  In the case Schlegel v. Bank of America, N.A., et al., the Court denied the request for attorney’s fees, citing the “test” to be used.  It is as follows:  In determining whether a party has shown the reasonableness of the fees, the fact finder may consider the time and effort expended by the attorney, the nature of the services rendered, the complexity of the services, the value of the services to the client, the results obtained, whether the fees incurred were consistent with those generally charged for similar services, and whether the services were necessary and appropriate.
    With all of this said, you could win a contested trial on the merits, but be forced to present an “expert witness” (i.e., another attorney) to testify to the reasonableness of your attorney’s fees! To avoid this problem, and, to insure at least a fighting chance of obtaining at least the 25%, or even 33 1/3^rd % (which most attorneys charge in percentage collection cases), creditors should make certain that their forms specify "____% attorney's fees", or amend the standard form to "____%" and have the debtor initial adjacent to the change.
    It is important to note that the judicial award of attorney's fees is made upon the entry of judgment.  If creditors take their own judgment, no attorney's fees will be awarded, even though the judgment may eventually be turned over to an attorney for collection.  In this case creditors, not the debtor, will bear the full cost of collection.  Accordingly, I recommend that creditors timely turn over all accounts to their attorney for prompt action.