The Twentieth Judicial Circuit examined a debtor's
assertion that the note's "detailed enumeration of events consisting
default was inconsistent with a demand note", and that since the note was
not a demand note, the creditor must demonstrate "good faith" in
accelerating repayment of the note. The
case was NationsBank of Virginia,
N.A. v Barnes. The Court examined
Virginia Code §8.3A - 108(a), which states that a note is payable "on demand"
if it says it is payable on demand or states no time for payment. The Court found that the note in this case
was a form with a box "on demand" checked, with no time set for
repayment, only a provision requiring monthly payments of interest. The Court ruled that the note was unambiguous
and clearly a demand note, and that no showing of "good faith" was
required before requesting payment on the note.
Despite
the favorable result for the creditor, great care should always be taken to
clearly identify payment demand terms.
No comments:
Post a Comment